Bidford-on-Avon, Warwickshire. Mon to Fri.01789 224228sales@tci-construction.com

Example project

Deep relief precast units, and a face built for a hundred pours.

Forty millimetres of relief with tight returns, running as a production item in a precast yard. Polyurethane would not have lasted the run, and the air had to be given somewhere to go.

RouteCast silicone on rigid frame
PoursAround 100
SectorPrecast manufacturer
Route
Cast silicone face
Relief depth
40 mm
Backing
Rigid frame
Pours
Around 100
Cast concrete units with moulded recesses and a lifting eye beside the grey silicone mould that formed them

The brief

A feature panel that was going to be made over and over.

A precast manufacturer had won a facade package with a repeating feature panel: deep modelled relief, around forty millimetres from the high point to the ground, with returns close to vertical. The panels were to be wet cast in a bed under a covered yard as a standing production item.

They already knew what they wanted made. What they asked us to settle was the face material and the backing, because they had been burned before by tooling that was fine for a sample panel and finished long before the order was.

The difficulty

Deep relief punishes the wrong face material and traps air.

At forty millimetres with near-vertical returns, every strike pulls the face material into tension around the relief and then asks it to recover its shape. Polyurethane liners are normally quoted in tens of pours and at this depth they are at the pessimistic end of that, because the material takes a set and the relief slowly loses its edge. Silicone is normally quoted in hundreds. On a one-off panel that difference is an argument about price. On a production item it decides the job.

The second difficulty was air. A deep pocket with tight returns is an air trap: the pocket fills last, the air above it has nowhere to go, and it prints as a blowhole cluster in the most visible part of the relief. The yard's instinct was to vibrate harder, which on a wet cast face brings its own problems with segregation and grout lines.

Third, the panel was big and silicone is a face material. An unbacked liner of that area moves under the head of concrete, and a face that moves gives a panel that is not the size on the drawing.

How we did it

Silicone face, rigid frame, and air given a route out.

01

Face material chosen on the pour count

We specified a silicone face because the run was in the hundreds. The comparison we put in writing was the honest one: polyurethane costs less to buy and is a reasonable choice at tens of pours, and it was the wrong choice here. The same reasoning is set out on the mould materials page.

02

Relief reprofiled where it cost nothing to do so

Two of the returns were drawn dead vertical. We proposed a small draft on them, checked it against the elevation with the designer, and it was not visible at viewing distance. That change alone took most of the stripping load off the face and it made every pour after it easier.

03

Air routed out of the deep pockets

The pockets were oriented and vented so the last air out of the deepest point has a path to the top of the pour, and the yard's placing sequence was changed to fill the relief first rather than flood the bed. That is a cheaper fix than more energy at the poker, and it does not risk the face.

04

A backing frame designed with the face

The face sits on a rigid backing frame with ribbing and handling points, made alongside the liner rather than improvised in the yard. The frame is what holds the panel to size and it is what lets the crew move the tooling without levering on the face.

The numbers

A hundred pours, and the point at which tooling stops being the argument.

Same indicative published rate, same division.

The face was 4.5 square metres. At an indicative £350 per square metre that is £1,575. Cleaned properly and stored flat, casting around a hundred units, it puts 450 square metres of finished face on the building. That is £3.50 per square metre of face, which is £350 divided by a hundred, and it matches the figure the same published source gives at that level of reuse.

At three pounds fifty a square metre the tooling has stopped driving the decision. What drives it then is whether pour eighty looks like pour three, which is a question about the release agent, the strike sequence and whether anyone has trimmed or drilled the face. A liner rated for a hundred pours can be finished in twenty by a bad strike.

All of the arithmetic below runs at the same indicative rate of £350 per square metre of liner, from published figures from PERI UK and RECKLI. It is a market figure carried here so the division can be checked, and the liner calculator will run it on your own rate instead.

Scroll sideways to see the whole diagram.

Why the face on this job was silicone. The reuse counts are the general market position described on published figures from PERI UK and RECKLI and in the materials guide on this site. They are not a measured TCI result, and no pour count is promised for any particular job.

Every money figure on this page is indicative. It is taken either from the illustrative two year duty cycle used across all five TCI sites or from published third-party pricing, and it is shown so the arithmetic can be checked. None of it is a quotation, and all of it must be replaced with TCI figures before launch.

Where it got to

Where the job ended up.

  • Face specified on the pour count rather than on how a sample panel looked
  • Two vertical returns given draft, agreed with the designer, invisible at viewing distance
  • Deep pockets vented and the placing sequence changed instead of vibrating harder
  • Rigid backing frame made with the face, so the panel holds the size on the drawing

More jobs

Other work of this kind.

Every example project

Similar job?

Tooling that dies before the order does?

Tell us the relief depth and how many units are in the package. Those two numbers usually decide the face material on their own.